Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as COCA-MIDOPROPYL BETAINE, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Coca midopropyl Betaine.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
A surfactant and a common contact sensitizer (a past "allergen of the year"). (ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Independent
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.