Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
An undisclosed blend; can hide allergens and sensitizers that are not individually labelled. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
An undisclosed blend that can hide strong sensitizers, phthalates and allergens the label never names — the leading cause of cosmetic allergic contact dermatitis. (IFRA restriction / EU Annex III (banned fragrance allergen); ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Permitted and used within typical limits, so this lens tolerates it. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: NTP Report on Carcinogens; EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List.