Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
No listed hazard trait recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
An ANSES endocrine-disruptor candidate (SNPE2) — listed as a candidate substance; other safety lenses treat cosmetic-grade ethanol as benign, so this is a point of disagreement. (ANSES — French national strategy on endocrine disruptors (SNPE2))
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.