Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as FRAGRANCE - PROPRIETARY.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
An undisclosed blend; can hide allergens and sensitizers that are not individually labelled. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
An undisclosed blend that can hide strong sensitizers, phthalates and allergens the label never names — the leading cause of cosmetic allergic contact dermatitis. (IFRA restriction / EU Annex III (banned fragrance allergen); ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Permitted and used within typical limits, so this lens tolerates it. (Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: NTP Report on Carcinogens; EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List.