Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as LIN - ALOOL, LIN- ALOOL.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
An EU-regulated fragrance allergen that must be labelled; a common contact-sensitization trigger. (EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen))
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
No listed hazard trait recognized for this ingredient.
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Allowed only under stated conditions or limits.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Permitted and used within typical limits, so this lens tolerates it. (EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen))
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Carries an EU harmonised classification (Skin Sens. 1B) — a skin sensitiser under CLP Annex VI, index 603-235-00-2. A hazard classification, not proof of harm at the level used. (EU CLP Regulation Annex VI, Table 3 (harmonised classification, ECHA export))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.