Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
A botanical essential oil and a recognized contact sensitizer, especially once oxidized by air/light (oxidation products such as ascaridole raise its allergenic potency). It also naturally carries labelled fragrance allergens (limonene, linalool). Kept as a proportionate caution, not a strong-sensitizer red flag. (SCCS opinion on Tea Tree Oil (SCCS/1155/08); CIR safety assessment)
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II, III, V and VI; CLP Annex VI harmonised classification; ECHA SVHC Candidate List (cosmetics-relevant subset).
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: NTP Report on Carcinogens; EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List.