Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient. Also written as methyl isothiazolinone, Methyl-isothiazolinone, Methyl Isothiazolinone…
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Government
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
—
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
A preservative and potent contact sensitizer (a past "allergen of the year"). (ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now))
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Carries a formal hazard classification. Not itself a cosmetic use rule.
Allowed only under stated conditions or limits.
Independent
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Government
A potent sensitizer: not permitted in leave-on products; capped in rinse-off products. (Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist)
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Carries an EU harmonised classification (Skin Sens. 1A) — a skin sensitiser under CLP Annex VI, index 613-326-00-9. A hazard classification, not proof of harm at the level used. (EU CLP Regulation Annex VI, Table 3 (harmonised classification, ECHA export))
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.