Ingredient profile
At least one of our safety lists speaks to this ingredient.
Raters don't agree. Here's where each one stands
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
EU Microplastics Restriction
Government
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
IARC Monographs
Government
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
IARC Monographs
Government
Styrene, a residual monomer of some styrene-copolymer film-formers, is classified probably carcinogenic to humans. (IARC Monographs, Vol. 121)
ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
Government
An ANSES endocrine-disruptor candidate (SNPE2), classified Repr. 2 and prohibited in cosmetics. (ANSES — French national strategy on endocrine disruptors (SNPE2))
EU Microplastics Restriction
Also screened — not on these lists
Each jurisdiction is reported on its own terms, from its own official lists. Where they disagree, that disagreement is the finding. Absence from a list is never a safety claim.
Prohibited as a cosmetic ingredient in this jurisdiction.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: Health Canada Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist.
Government
Solid latex particles used as an opacifier/film-former; water-insoluble and non-biodegradable — in scope. (EU Regulation 2023/2055 (REACH Annex XVII, entry 78))
EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Government
Carries an EU harmonised classification (Repr. 2) — a suspected (category 2) carcinogen, mutagen or reproductive toxicant under CLP Annex VI, index 601-026-00-0. A hazard classification, not proof of harm at the level used. (EU CLP Regulation Annex VI, Table 3 (harmonised classification, ECHA export))
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent
No EU-regulated hazard recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Precautionary Screen
Independent
No listed hazard trait recognized for this ingredient.
Greenlens Tolerance Screen
Independent
No prohibited or high-risk classification for this ingredient.
Not on the lists we hold for this jurisdiction. That is an absence of a listing, not a safety finding.
Checked: OEHHA Proposition 65 list.
Appears on an official list. A listing, not a use ban.