Prodigieux lait parfumé safety rating

Prodigieux lait parfumé safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.

40ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment

94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

54 pts apart

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · IARC Monographs · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Nuxe as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 4 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmental1.0×

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 1 identified

Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust45 of 46 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 45 of 46 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (14)

LIMONENEfragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
PARFUM/FRAGRANCEundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
LINALYL ACETATEfragrance materialfragranceraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
LINALOOLfragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CITRONELLOLfragrance materialperfumingraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
GERANIOLfragrance materialperfuming · tonicraters disagree
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CITRIC ACIDfragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
SODIUM HYDROXIDEbuffering · denaturantraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
CARBOMERemulsion stabilising · gel forming · viscosity controllingraters disagree
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
ACETYL CEDRENEfragrance materialperfumingraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
DIMETHYL PHENETHYL ACETATEraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
VANILLINfragrance materialfragranceraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
PELARGONIUM GRAVEOLENS FLOWER OILfragrance materialfragranceraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
ISOEUGENYL ACETATEfragrance materialperfumingraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (31)

No data in our sources (1)

PINENE [N2211/D

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (4)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

fragrance materialLINALOOL, LIMONENE, CITRONELLOL, GERANIOL
- LINALOOL: A floral fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 84: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
- LIMONENE: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
- CITRONELLOL: A rose-and-citrus fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 86: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
- GERANIOL: A rose-scented fragrance component named separately on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 78: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk.
undeclared fragrance blend