The Longevity Memory Cream safety rating

The Longevity Memory Cream safety rating | Greenlens

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.

40ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment

94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent

050100

See why, ingredient by ingredient

All 5268 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

54 pts apart

A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · IARC Monographs

Environmental

Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

Labor

Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Tatcha US Prod as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

Packaging

Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

Ingredient safety1.0×

Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Labor1.0×

Packaging1.0×

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

What we know about the packaging

Unidentified0 of 2 identified

None of the 2 packaging components is identified beyond its broad material, so the packaging score is a stand-in — not a reading of this container.

Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

How we know the packaging

Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust49 of 52 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 49 of 52 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.

Worth a look (12)

Citralfragrance materialperfuming · flavouringraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Limonenefragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Parfum/fragranceundeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Linaloolfragrance materialperfuming · deodorantraters disagree
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Linalyl Acetatefragrance materialfragranceraters disagree
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Turpentinefragrance materialperfumingraters disagree
EU harmonised skin sensitizerflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Potassium Hydroxidebufferingraters disagree
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Phenoxyethanolpreservative · antimicrobialraters disagree
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Citrus Aurantium Bergamia Peel Oilperfumingraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Citrus Limon Peel Oilfragrance materialperfuming · fragrance · skin conditioningraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Pinenefragrance materialfragrance · antifoamingraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
Terpineolfragrance materialperfuming · fragranceraters disagree
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists →

No flags in our sources (37)

No data in our sources (3)

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

What these ingredient tags mean (5)

These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

fragrance materialCitral, Citrus Limon Peel Oil, Limonene, Linalool
- Citral: A lemon-scented fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related substances. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 70: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. As replaced by Commission Regulation (EU) 2026/909 of 27 April 2026, the entry is a GROUPED one covering citral, geranial and neral, declared collectively as "Citral", with per-product-type caps from 0,032% in deodorant to 1,2% in rinse-off and leave-on hair products. Its three substances carry two different sell-through dates: products not complying may not be placed on the Union market from 1 January 2027 in every case, and may not be made available from 1 July 2028 for citral, footnote (**), or from 1 August 2028 for geranial and neral, footnote (***). In the consolidated text those two footnotes are renumbered (46) and (47); both are worded "these substances", where the footnotes that attach to a single named substance say "that substance".
- Citrus Limon Peel Oil: A citrus peel oil the EU names on its own account as a fragrance substance to be declared on the label. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 353, inserted by Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products. It is declarable in its OWN right, not by way of any component it carries. The name to look for on a label is "Citrus Limon Peel Oil". The duty applies now. Transition footnote (40) lets stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, be made available until 31 July 2028.
- Limonene: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.