Living nature
Eyeshadow - Blossom (Shimmer - Pink)
makeup
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 43-point gap between the two loudest voices.
47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs90Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 43 pts apart- 88
- 47
- 80
- 90
- 85
- 65
Lowest 47 · highest 90 · gap 43
Also screened — no listing found
Environmental
Also screened — no listing found
Labor
- 74
Coverage & match quality
7 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–10088
- IARC Monographs47 on 0–10047
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan80 on 0–10080
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen90 on 0–10090
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–10085
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–10065
Average of 88 · 47 · 80 · 90 · 85 · 65pillar61
Raters split here, so this 61 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
80/100
Flagged 2 of 13 ingredients: 2 restricted.
- TALCEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
Starts at 100; 10 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 10 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good10 of 12 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 10 of 12 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Talcabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Micacolorantanticakingopacifying | colorantanticakingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Squalaneemollienthair conditioningrefatting | emollienthair conditioningrefatting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Zea Mays starchabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Titanium dioxideuv filteruv absorbercolorant | uv filteruv absorbercolorant | ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Zinc stearatecolorantanticakingslip modifier | colorantanticakingslip modifier | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Manganese violet | Not in our sources | No data | |
| Iron oxides | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| Silicaabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Ultramarineshair dyeing | hair dyeing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Simmondsia chinensis seed oilemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | emollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sorbic acid Tocopherol acetate | Not in our sources | No data |