Maria Nila
Texture Spray Travel
hair
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 22-point gap between the two loudest voices.
78Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 22 pts apart- 78
- 94
- 100
- 80
Lowest 78 · highest 100 · gap 22
Environmental
Also screened — no listing found
Labor
- 92
Coverage & match quality
5 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan78 on 0–10078
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–10094
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100100
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–10080
Average of 78 · 94 · 100 · 80pillar83
Raters split here, so this 83 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
78/100
Flagged 2 of 15 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern.
- N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
- Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
Starts at 100; 13 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 22 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust13 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 13 of 15 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrofluorocarbon 152apropellant | propellant | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Dimethyl Etherpropellantsolventviscosity controlling | propellantsolventviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Alcohol Denatfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | fragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Propanediolsolventviscosity controlling | solventviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Helianthus Annuus Seed Extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Squalaneemollienthair conditioningrefatting | emollienthair conditioningrefatting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| VP/VA Copolymerfilm formingbindinghair fixing | film formingbindinghair fixing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Dimethiconeemollientantifoamingskin conditioning | emollientantifoamingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Trimethylsiloxyphenyl Dimethiconehair conditioning | hair conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Triethyl Citrateperfumingfragranceplasticiser | perfumingfragranceplasticiser | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Silica Dimethicone | Not in our sources | No data | |
| Silylate | Not in our sources | No data | |
| Butylene Glycolfragrancehumectantskin conditioning | fragrancehumectantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Parfum/Fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreeinternational.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.