Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Maria Nila/Cica Oil
Cica Oil
Maria Nila

Cica Oil

skincare

Your composite

57OUT OF 100Fair

range 46–89

22▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
92
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

44-point split

11

Scan

55

Precautionary

25

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 85-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
85Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 85 pts apart
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    11
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    25
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernmentunverified match
    80
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    0
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    50

Lowest 0 · highest 85 · gap 85

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      92

    Coverage & match quality

    8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan11 on 0–100→11
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen25 on 0–100→25
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
    • ECHA SVHC Candidate List80 on 0–100→80
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors0 on 0–100→0
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)50 on 0–100→50
    Average of 85 · 11 · 25 · 55 · 80 · 0 · 50pillar22

    Raters split here, so this 22 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    11/100

    Flagged 12 of 24 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 8 regulated allergens.

    • Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane; D4EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
    • Inorganic sulfites and bisulfites (12)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • AnetholeEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • CitralEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • CitronellolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Geranyl AcetateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • Linalyl AcetateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • Tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenesEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

    Starts at 100; 13 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 44 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·22 of 24 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 22 of 24 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Cyclomethicone→emollienthair conditioningsolventemollienthair conditioningsolvent10/10EU-prohibited· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Dimethiconol→emollientantifoamingmoisturisingemollientantifoamingmoisturisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Centella Asiatica Leaf Extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Prunus Persica Flower Extract→moisturisingskin conditioningmoisturisingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Citrus Paradisi Fruit Extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningExamined, no flagReferenced
    Olea Europaea Fruit Extract→bleachingskin conditioningbleachingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Aqua/Water/Eau→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Butylene Glycol→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Citric Acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Sodium Benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Sodium Metabisulfite→preservativeantioxidantreducingpreservativeantioxidantreducing4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Anethole→fragrancedenaturantfragrancedenaturant4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Citral→perfumingflavouringperfumingflavouring7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Citronellol→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Citrus Aurantium Peel Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Geranyl Acetate→perfumingtonicperfumingtonic6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Lemongrass Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Limonene→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Linalool→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Linalyl Acetate→fragrancefragrance6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Parfum/Fragrance→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreeinternational.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.