Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Rougj/Double Liner Inverno Rougj x Liu Jo
Double Liner Inverno Rougj x Liu Jo
Rougj

Double Liner Inverno Rougj x Liu Jo

uncategorized

Your composite

81OUT OF 100Good

range 76–90

75▲▼ split
Safety
86
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

4-point split

90

Scan

93

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 29-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 29 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    90
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    93
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    65

Lowest 65 · highest 94 · gap 29

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
    86

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan90 on 0–100→90
  • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen93 on 0–100→93
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–100→65
Average of 90 · 82 · 93 · 94 · 65pillar75

Raters split here, so this 75 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

90/100

Flagged 2 of 20 ingredients: 1 restricted.

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

Starts at 100; 19 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 4 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·20 of 20 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 20 listed ingredients.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
AQUA→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
AMMONIUM ACRYLATES COPOLYMER→film formingantistaticbindingfilm formingantistaticbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
STYRENE/ ACRYLATES/AMMONIUM METHACRYLATE COPOLYMER→film formingopacifyingfilm formingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
BUTYLENE GLYCOL→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
STYRENE/ ACRYLATES COPOLYMER→film formingopacifyingfilm formingopacifying4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
METHYLPROPANEDIOL→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
PHENOXYETHANOL→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
CAPRYLYL GLYCOL→emollientdeodoranthair conditioningemollientdeodoranthair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
PHENYLPROPANOL→perfumingfragrancesolventperfumingfragrancesolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SIMETHICONE→emollientantifoaminghair conditioningemollientantifoaminghair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
SODIUM LAURETH-12 SULFATE→cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingcleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN→deodorantskin conditioningdeodorantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
C11-15 PARETH-7→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
SODIUM DEHYDROACETATE→preservativepreservativeNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
POTASSIUM SORBATE→preservativefragrancepreservativefragranceNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
TETRASODIUM EDTA→chelatingchelatingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
SODIUM ACRYLATES COPOLYMER→film formingbindingopacifyingfilm formingbindingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
ALUMINA→abrasiveabsorbentanticakingabrasiveabsorbentanticakingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE→bindingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
CI 77891→colorantcolorant8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced