Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Naturopathica/Plant Stem Cell Booster Serum
Plant Stem Cell Booster Serum
Naturopathica

Plant Stem Cell Booster Serum

uncategorized

Your composite

99OUT OF 100Excellent

range 97–100

99
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

3-point split

97

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Raters agree
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    97
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100

Coverage & match quality

2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan97 on 0–100→97
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
Average of 97 · 100pillar99

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

97/100

Flagged 1 of 40 ingredients: 1 regulated allergen.

  • Citrus Aurantium Amara Flower OilEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

Starts at 100; 39 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 3 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·27 of 40 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 27 of 40 listed ingredients; 13 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Full Ingredient List→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Water/Aqua/Eau→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Leuconostoc/Radish Root Ferment Filtrate→antimicrobialanti-seborrheicantimicrobialanti-seborrheicNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Cetearyl Olivate→hair conditioninghair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sorbitan Olivate→surfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Buddleja Davidii Meristem Cell Culture→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Echinacea Angustifolia Meristem Cell Culture→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Rosa Canina Seed Oil→emollientemollientNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Aleurites Moluccana Nut Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Sodium Hyaluronate→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Avena Sativa Bran Extract→abrasiveabrasiveNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Euterpe Oleracea Pulp Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Punica Granatum Seed Extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Sambucus Canadensis Flower Extract→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Citrus Aurantium Amara Flower Oil→fragranceskin conditioningfragranceskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Helichrysum Italicum Flower Oil→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragranceNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Pelargonium Graveolens Leaf Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Anthemis Nobilis Flower Oil→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Tanacetum Annuum Flower Oil→fragranceskin conditioningfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Rosmarinus Officinalis Leaf Extract→fragranceantimicrobialskin conditioningfragranceantimicrobialskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Amorphophallus Konjac Root Powder→abrasiveabrasiveNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Pullulan→film formingbindingfilm formingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Hydrogenated Lecithin→surfactant - emulsifyingskin conditioningsurfactant - emulsifyingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Lactic Acid→humectantbufferingskin conditioninghumectantbufferingskin conditioning4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Sodium Anisate→fragranceantimicrobialflavouringfragranceantimicrobialflavouringNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sclerotium Gum→emulsion stabilisingskin conditioningviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Xanthan Gum→bindingemulsion stabilisinggel formingbindingemulsion stabilisinggel formingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Sodium Benzoate→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Potassium Sorbate→preservativefragrancepreservativefragranceNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Citric Acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Clinical Results IMMEDIATELY→—Not in our sourcesNo data
AFTER 24 HOURS→—Not in our sourcesNo data
100% agree skin looks smoother→—Not in our sourcesNo data
AFTER 4 WEEKS→—Not in our sourcesNo data
97% agree skin looks smoother→—Not in our sourcesNo data
94% agree skin looks firmer & healthier→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Based on 34 participants→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Read more Read less→—Not in our sourcesNo data