Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/MISSHA/Cardi B's PICK | M BB Boomer Primer
Cardi B's PICK | M BB Boomer Primer
MISSHA

Cardi B's PICK | M BB Boomer Primer

makeup40ml

Your composite

55OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–65

57▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

28-point split

65

Scan

60

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 41-point gap between the two loudest voices.

47IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 41 pts apart
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate ListGovernmentunverified match
    60
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    47
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    65
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    60
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    88
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    65

Lowest 47 · highest 88 · gap 41

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
    78

Labor

  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    30

Coverage & match quality

9 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List60 on 0–100→60
  • IARC Monographs47 on 0–100→47
  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan65 on 0–100→65
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen60 on 0–100→60
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–100→88
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–100→65
Average of 60 · 47 · 65 · 60 · 88 · 85 · 65pillar57

Raters split here, so this 57 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

65/100

Flagged 5 of 36 ingredients: 2 restricted, 1 of concern, 1 regulated allergen.

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • Jasminum Grandiflorum Flower ExtractEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • TALCEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

Starts at 100; 32 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 28 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·34 of 36 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 34 of 36 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Water→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Cyclopentasiloxane→emollienthair conditioningskin conditioningemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning4/10Persistent / bioaccumulative· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Cyclohexasiloxane→emollienthair conditioningskin conditioningemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning4/10Persistent / bioaccumulative· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Butylene Glycol→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Mica→colorantanticakingopacifyingcolorantanticakingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
PEG-10 Dimethicone→hair conditioningskin conditioninghair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Titanium Dioxide→uv filteruv absorbercolorantuv filteruv absorbercolorant8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Niacinnamide→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Pentylene Glycol→skin conditioningsolventskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Disteardimonium Hectorite→light stabilizerviscosity controllinglight stabilizerviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Diamond Powder→abrasiveabrasiveNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Moringa Oleifera Seed Oil→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Ruby Powder→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Amethyst Powder→abrasiveabrasiveNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Pearl Powder→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Tourmaline→viscosity controllingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Chrysanthemum Morifolium Flower Extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Jasminum Officinale Extract→fragrancemoisturisingsoothingfragrancemoisturisingsoothing4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Platinum Powder→abrasiveskin conditioningabrasiveskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Dicaprylyl Carbonate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Magnesium Sulfate→bulkingviscosity controllingbulkingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Methyl Methacrylate Crosspolymer→film formingfilm forming4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Triethoxycaprylylsilane→bindingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Ethylhexyl Glycerin→deodorantskin conditioningdeodorantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Acrylates/Dimethicone Copolymer→film forminganticakingbindingfilm forminganticakingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Adenosine→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Mannan→film formingfilm formingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Squalane→emollienthair conditioningrefattingemollienthair conditioningrefattingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Polymethylsilsesquioxane→opacifyingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Tocopherol→fragranceantioxidantskin conditioningfragranceantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Talc→abrasiveabsorbentanticakingabrasiveabsorbentanticaking6/10IARC probable carcinogen (Group 2A)· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Disodium EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Phenoxyethanol→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Fragrance→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from ethicalelephant.com ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.