Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Ultra Violette/Supreme Screen SPF 50+ Hydrating SKINSCREEN
Supreme Screen SPF 50+ Hydrating SKINSCREEN
Ultra Violette

Supreme Screen SPF 50+ Hydrating SKINSCREEN

sun75ml52 AUD MSRP · 69.33 AUD/100 mlGTIN 9355909000226

Your composite

46OUT OF 100Poor

Packaging only

—
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
46
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

6 ingredients

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    Finding shown, score not counted — partial label

    • ECHA SVHC Candidate List flagged an ingredient
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors flagged an ingredient
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist flagged an ingredient

    This finding stands: the ingredient it names really is on the list we hold. Its 0-100 score does not count toward the pillar, because we only hold part of this label, and a partial list can only ever score too generously.

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

    ✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 55% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Packaging

      • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

      Coverage & match quality

      1 rating · 1 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Laborno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      What we know about the packaging

      Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

      Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

      • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

      This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

      How we know the packaging

      Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

      The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Partial list·31 shown

      Only part of this product's ingredient list could be read from its source, so what is shown here is incomplete. We do not publish a safety score from a partial list.

      Worth a look (6)

      • Triethanolamine8/10fragrance · buffering · surfactant - cleansingraters disagree

        ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

      • Alcohol6/10commonly dryingfragrance · antimicrobial · antifoamingraters disagree

        ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • Parfum6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfuming · fragranceraters disagree

        Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      • Cyclopentasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

        Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • Cyclohexasiloxane4/10emollient · hair conditioning · skin conditioningraters disagree

        Persistent / bioaccumulative · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • Citric Acid4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

        Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      ✓No flags in our sources (24)

      • Aqua
      • Isostearyl Neopentanoate
      • Glycerinhumectant
      • Butylene Glycol
      • Dimethiconerich occlusive
      • Cetearyl Alcohol
      • Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer
      • Nylon 6/12
      • Ceteareth-20
      • Squalane
      • Caprylyl Glycol
      • PEG-40 Stearate
      • Silica
      • Saccharide Isomerate
      • Decyl Glucoside
      • Tocopheryl Acetate
      • Disodium EDTA
      • Polysorbate 60
      • Caprylhydroxamic Acid
      • Pentylene Glycol
      • Terminalia Ferdinandiana Fruit Extract
      • Propylene Glycolcommon irritant
      • Xanthan Gum
      • Sodium Chloride

      No data in our sources (1)

      • l-carnosine

      Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

      What these ingredient tags mean (5)

      These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

      • commonly dryingAlcohol

        • Alcohol: A fast-evaporating solvent that leaves a dry finish. International Chemical Safety Card ICSC 0044, Ethanol (anhydrous), prepared by an international group of experts for the ILO and WHO: "The substance defats the skin, which may cause dryness or cracking." Bommannan et al., as reported by Lachenmeier DW, "Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity", J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;3:26, DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-3-26, open access, reference 82: "Bommannan et al. found in vivo in humans that ethanol enters the skin and removes measurable quantities of the lipid barrier material from the stratum corneum." Both describe stronger exposures than a cosmetic formula.
      • common irritantPropylene Glycol

        • Propylene Glycol: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
      • undeclared fragrance blendParfum

        • Parfum: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
      • rich occlusiveDimethicone

        • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
      • humectantGlycerin

        • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".