Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 69-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Lowest 25 · highest 94 · gap 69
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 47 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 5 of 22 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 1 regulated allergen.
Starts at 100; 19 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 69 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust20 of 22 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 20 of 22 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aquasolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sodium C14-16 Olefin Sulfonatecleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Cocamidopropyl Betaineantistaticcleansinghair conditioning | antistaticcleansinghair conditioning | Strong contact sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Polylactic Acidabrasive | abrasive | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaineantistaticcleansinghair conditioning | antistaticcleansinghair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Polysorbate 20surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Acrylates/C10-30 Alkyl Acrylate | Not in our sources | No data | |
| Glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Jojoba Estersemollientmoisturisingsoothing | emollientmoisturisingsoothing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Sodium Lauryl Sulfoacetatecleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | cleansingfoamingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juiceskin conditioning | skin conditioning | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Salvia Officinalis Extractantimicrobialantioxidantanti-seborrheic | antimicrobialantioxidantanti-seborrheic | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Mentha Piperita Leaf Extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Citrus Aurantifolia Fruit Extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | Examined, no flag | Referenced |
| Citrus Aurantium Dulcis Fruit Extractfragranceskin conditioning | fragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Citrus Medica Limonum Fruit Extract | Not in our sources | No data | |
| Fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| Sodium Hydroxidebufferingdenaturant | bufferingdenaturant | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Phenoxyethanolpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Caprylyl Glycolemollientdeodoranthair conditioning | emollientdeodoranthair conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Diazolidinyl Ureapreservative | preservative | Carcinogen-linked· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Tetrasodium EDTAchelating | chelating | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |