SACHEU Beauty
EYE-conic DUOs
uncategorized
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 33-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs98Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 33 pts apart- 90
- 82
- 98
- 94
- 65
Lowest 65 · highest 98 · gap 33
Also screened — no listing found
- California Proposition 65
- ECHA SVHC Candidate List
- US NTP Report on Carcinogens
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
- 86
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan90 on 0–10090
- IARC Monographs82 on 0–10082
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen98 on 0–10098
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–10094
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–10065
Average of 90 · 82 · 98 · 94 · 65pillar75
Raters split here, so this 75 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
90/100
Flagged 2 of 15 ingredients: 1 restricted.
Starts at 100; 14 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 8 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust15 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water/Aqua | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| Micacolorantanticakingopacifying | colorantanticakingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Calcium Aluminum Borosilicatebulking | bulking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Xanthan Gumbindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | bindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Squalaneemollienthair conditioningrefatting | emollienthair conditioningrefatting | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Acrylates Copolymerfilm formingantistaticbinding | film formingantistaticbinding | EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Polysorbate 20surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Triethanolaminefragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing | fragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing | ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Hyaluronic Acidhumectantantistaticmoisturising | humectantantistaticmoisturising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Propanediolsolventviscosity controlling | solventviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Aloe Barbadensis Flower Extractemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Phenoxyethanolpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Tin Oxideabrasiveopacifyingbulking | abrasiveopacifyingbulking | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Centella Asiatica Leaf Extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Chamomilla Recutita Flower Extractfragranceskin conditioning | fragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |