Kim Chi Chic
DONUT GLAZE - 01 Strawberry Sprinkles
uncategorized
Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated
VMV Hypoallergenics
Velvet Matte Lipstick+58 on ingredient safety
$14
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.
28Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 9346 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
54 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Kim Chi Chic as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Good29 of 36 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 36 listed ingredients; 7 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (8)
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists →
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists →
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (21)
- HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- OCTYLDODECANOL
- POLYISOBUTENE
- HYDROGENATED STYRENE/ISOPRENE COPOLYMER
- CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- DEXTRIN PALMITATE
- ASPARTAME
- DIBUTYL ETHYLHEXANOYL GLUTAMIDE
- DIBUTYL LAUROYL GLUTAMIDE
- SQUALANE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRA-DI-T-BUTYL HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE
- UNDARIA PINNATIFIDA EXTRACT
- BRASSICA CAMPESTRIS SEED OIL
- OPUNTIA FICUS-INDICA FLOWER EXTRACT
- CAMELINA SATIVA SEED OIL
- TOCOPHEROL
- ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
- IRON OXIDES
No data in our sources (7)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (1)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
undeclared fragrance blendFRAGRANCE
- FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.