Fulton & Roark · The Window Fragrance Sample

Why this score

Three independent Greenlens lenses read the same 25 ingredients and land 45 points apart. That gap is not an error. Each lens asks a different question, and this page shows every answer, ingredient by ingredient, blended into nothing.

How well-studied are these ingredients?

Data coverage · Robust

25/25

Our sources have reference data on all 25 listed ingredients. Our sources can only speak to ingredients they recognize — either flagged by an authority or known to be a common, well-characterized ingredient. An uncharacterized ingredient is a gap in our data, not a clean bill of health: a quiet safety scan over ingredients we can’t place is a weaker signal than one over ingredients we can.

Three lenses, one ingredient list

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent

88Excellent

The regulatory baseline. Follows EU cosmetic law: prohibited and restricted ingredients cost points, and allergen labelling is capped so it cannot tank a score on its own.

Flagged 22 of 25 ingredients: 22 regulated allergens.

Greenlens Precautionary Screen

Independent

55Fair

The strict lens. Flags any ingredient with a listed hazard trait (SIN List, IARC, Prop 65), even when regulators still permit it.

Flagged 1 of 25 ingredients on hazard grounds: 1 endocrine-active. Score capped: an endocrine-active ingredient is present.

Greenlens Tolerance Screen

Independent

100Excellent

The lenient lens. Trusts dose and regulation: permitted ingredients kept within their legal caps are tolerated, and only genuinely prohibited substances take a big hit.

No prohibited or high-risk ingredients among 25; permitted ingredients tolerated.

These lenses disagree. A split of 45 points crosses our disagreement threshold (20). We keep every verdict and never average them; the table below is where the split comes from.

Every flagged ingredient, under every lens

Ingredient	Scan	Precautionary	Tolerance
Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate)ChemSec SIN List (Substitute It Now); EU endocrine-disruptor assessment / SCCS opinion	·	−22endocrine	·
HexamethylindanopyranEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)	−3allergen	·

Beyond ingredients: the other pillars

Environmental

No rating; no number invented.

Labor

No rating; no number invented.

Packaging

No rating; no number invented.

Coverage & match quality

5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

The overall ring on the product page is the weighted mean of the four pillars using your weights, computed fresh on every visit and never stored. How each lens's reference lists were built, penalty by penalty, is on the methodology page.

← Back to The Window Fragrance Sample