Coverage & match quality
3 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 11 of 26 ingredients: 10 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 16 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 12 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust23 of 26 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 23 of 26 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| water/eau/aqua | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| pumiceabrasivebulkingviscosity controlling | abrasivebulkingviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| eucalyptus globulus leaf oilperfumingskin conditioning | perfumingskin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| organic butyrospermum parkii butter | Not in our sources | No data | |
| organic cocos nucifera oil | Not in our sources | No data | |
| sodium chloridefragranceoral carebulking | fragranceoral carebulking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| sodium gluconatechelatingskin conditioning | chelatingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| mentha piperita oilperfumingfragrancerefreshing | perfumingfragrancerefreshing | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| pinenefragranceantifoaming | fragranceantifoaming | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| limoneneperfumingdeodorantsolvent | perfumingdeodorantsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| simmondsia chinensis seed powderskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| camphorfragrancedenaturantplasticiser | fragrancedenaturantplasticiser | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| mentholfragrancedenaturantrefreshing | fragrancedenaturantrefreshing | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| honey/mel/miel | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued | |
| organic helianthus annuus seed oil | Not in our sources | No data | |
| citrus grandis peel oilperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | Examined, no flag | Referenced |
| rosmarinus officinalis leaf oilfragranceskin conditioning | fragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| beta-caryophylleneperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| terpineolperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| linaloolperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| citralperfumingflavouring | perfumingflavouring | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| aloe barbadensis leaf juice powderskin conditioning | skin conditioning | IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| maltodextrinfilm formingabsorbentbinding | film formingabsorbentbinding | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| crithmum maritimum extracttonicskin conditioning | tonicskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| salix alba leaf extractskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.