Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Kopari Beauty/Nectar Glow Shimmer Body Oil
Kopari Beauty

Nectar Glow Shimmer Body Oil

uncategorized

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 66–94

73▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

29-point split

66

Scan

95

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.

66Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 28 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    66
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94

Lowest 66 · highest 94 · gap 28

Coverage & match quality

2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan66 on 0–100→66
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
Average of 66 · 94pillar73

Raters split here, so this 73 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

66/100

Flagged 10 of 22 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 8 regulated allergens.

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • Tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenesEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • Dimethyl Phenethyl AcetateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • Amyl SalicylateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • HydroxycitronellalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • Linalyl AcetateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
  • TerpineolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
  • Eugenyl AcetateEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0
  • Citrus Aurantium Amara Flower OilEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0

Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 29 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·20 of 22 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 20 of 22 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Ethylhexyl Palmitate→perfumingemollientperfumingemollientNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Isohexadecane→emollientsolventemollientsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oil→emollienthair conditioningskin conditioningemollienthair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Silica→abrasiveabsorbentanticakingabrasiveabsorbentanticakingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Calcium Titanium Borosilicate→abrasivebulkingabrasivebulkingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Tocopherol→fragranceantioxidantskin conditioningfragranceantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Titanium Dioxide→uv filteruv absorbercolorantuv filteruv absorbercolorant8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Mica→colorantanticakingopacifyingcolorantanticakingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Iron Oxides→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Tin Oxide→abrasiveopacifyingbulkingabrasiveopacifyingbulkingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Fragrance→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenes→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Dimethyl Phenethyl Acetate→—4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Amyl Salicylate→perfumingskin conditioningperfumingskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Hydroxycitronellal→perfumingperfuming4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Linalyl Acetate→fragrancefragrance6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Terpineol→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Eugenyl Acetate→fragrancefragrance4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Citrus Aurantium Amara Peel Oil→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeCosIng-catalogued
msai-detailed-sticky-cta-wrapper→—Not in our sourcesNo data
msai-sticky-cta-visible→—Not in our sourcesNo data