Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 28-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Lowest 66 · highest 94 · gap 28
Coverage & match quality
2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 73 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 10 of 22 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern, 8 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 29 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust20 of 22 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 20 of 22 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethylhexyl Palmitateperfumingemollient | perfumingemollient | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Caprylic/Capric Triglycerideperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Isohexadecaneemollientsolvent | emollientsolvent | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Simmondsia Chinensis Seed Oilemollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | emollienthair conditioningskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Silicaabrasiveabsorbentanticaking | abrasiveabsorbentanticaking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Calcium Titanium Borosilicateabrasivebulking | abrasivebulking | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Tocopherolfragranceantioxidantskin conditioning | fragranceantioxidantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Titanium Dioxideuv filteruv absorbercolorant | uv filteruv absorbercolorant | ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Micacolorantanticakingopacifying | colorantanticakingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Iron Oxides | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| Tin Oxideabrasiveopacifyingbulking | abrasiveopacifyingbulking | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| Tetramethyl Acetyloctahydronaphthalenesperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Dimethyl Phenethyl Acetate | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| Amyl Salicylateperfumingskin conditioning | perfumingskin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Hydroxycitronellalperfuming | perfuming | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Linalyl Acetatefragrance | fragrance | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Terpineolperfumingfragrance | perfumingfragrance | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Eugenyl Acetatefragrance | fragrance | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Citrus Aurantium Amara Peel Oilskin conditioning | skin conditioning | EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | CosIng-catalogued |
| msai-detailed-sticky-cta-wrapper | Not in our sources | No data | |
| msai-sticky-cta-visible | Not in our sources | No data |