Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Cocokind/advanced retinol gel 0.5%
Cocokind

advanced retinol gel 0.5%

uncategorized

Your composite

87OUT OF 100Excellent
100
Safety
—
Eco
74
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

lenses agree

100

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Raters agree
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100

Labor

  • Open Beauty Facts CertificationsNonprofitunverified match
    74

Coverage & match quality

3 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan100 on 0–100→100
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
Average of 100 · 100pillar100

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

100/100

No EU-regulated hazards recognized among 12 ingredients.

Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. See how the strict and lenient lenses read the same list, ingredient by ingredient.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·12 of 12 characterized

Our sources have reference data on all 12 listed ingredients.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
water/eau→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
aloe barbadensis leaf juice→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
glycine soja oil→perfumingemollientskin conditioningperfumingemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
hydroxyethyl acrylate/sodium acryloyldimethyl taurate copolymer→emulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
caprylic/capric triglyceride→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
coco-caprylate/caprate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
c14-22 alcohols→emulsion stabilisingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
fructooligosaccharides→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
dimethyl isosorbide→solventviscosity controllingsolventviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
glyceryl caprylate→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
pentylene glycol→skin conditioningsolventskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized