Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/ORLY/GELFX TOP2BOTTOM Gel Base & Topcoat
GELFX TOP2BOTTOM Gel Base & Topcoat
ORLY

GELFX TOP2BOTTOM Gel Base & Topcoat

makeup

Your composite

69OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–100

69▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

45-point split

88

Scan

55

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 45 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    88
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    90

Lowest 55 · highest 100 · gap 45

Also screened — no listing found

  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan88 on 0–100→88
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–100→90
    Average of 88 · 100 · 55 · 80 · 90pillar69

    Raters split here, so this 69 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    88/100

    Flagged 1 of 12 ingredients: 1 of concern.

    • BHT / BHACommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

    Starts at 100; 11 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 45 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·10 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 10 of 12 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Bis-HEA Poly -9/IPDI Copolymer→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Hydroxypropyl Methacrylate→film formingfilm formingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Pentaerythrityl Tetramercaptopropionate→film formingfilm formingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Bis- Pentaerythrityl Diacrylate/IPDI Copolymer→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Sucrose Benzoate→film formingplasticiserfilm formingplasticiserNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Ethyl Trimethylbenzoyl Phenylphosphinate→uv absorberuv absorberNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Trimethylolpropane Trimethacrylate→film formingfilm formingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Pentaerythrityl Triacrylate→film formingbindingfilm formingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Pentaerythrityl Tetraacrylate→film formingfilm forming6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Hydroxycyclohexyl Phenyl Ketone→bindingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Dimethicone→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BHT→fragranceantioxidantfragranceantioxidant7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced