Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 75-point gap between the two loudest voices.
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 51% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Philosophy as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
10 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust67 of 67 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 67 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (18)
Carcinogen-linkedflagged by 6 of 9 lists
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists
Undisclosed fragrance blendflagged by 2 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
ANSES endocrine candidateflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
EU-regulated fragrance allergenflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Health Canada Hotlist — restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (49)
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from investors.coty.com ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.