Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Rare Beauty/Soft Pinch Liquid Contour
Soft Pinch Liquid Contour
Rare Beauty

Soft Pinch Liquid Contour

uncategorized$30 MSRPGTIN 840122907234
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+28 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 8128 cleaner options →8 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

84OUT OF 100Good

range 81–91

72▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
92
Labor
87
Pkg

Why this score

25-point split

70

Scan

95

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

8128 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 8128 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Rare Beauty as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·22 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 22 of 31 listed ingredients; 9 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (3)

    • Titanium Dioxide8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Red 7 Lake4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • Blue 1 Lake4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (19)

    • Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
    • Mica
    • Octyldodecanol
    • Hydrogenated Styrene/Isoprene Copolymer
    • Trimethylsiloxysilicate
    • Isododecane
    • Disteardimonium Hectorite
    • Sorbitan Sesquioleate
    • 1,2-Hexanediol
    • Tocopherol
    • Propylene Carbonate
    • Triethoxycaprylylsilane
    • Aluminum Hydroxide
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Pentaerythrityl Tetra-di-t-butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
    • Gardenia Florida Fruit Extract
    • Nelumbo Nucifera Flower Extract
    • Nymphaea Odorata Root Extract
    • Iron Oxides

    No data in our sources (9)

    • GENTLE
    • Hydrogenated Poly
    • MELLOW
    • SOLACE
    • SERENE
    • TRANQUIL
    • PEACEFUL
    • SUBLIME
    • Close Usage

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    Where this came from

    Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗

    Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.