Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Glossier/Body Hero Exfoliating Bar
Body Hero Exfoliating Bar
Glossier

Body Hero Exfoliating Bar

uncategorized

Your composite

79OUT OF 100Good

range 75–90

72▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
85
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

17-point split

78

Scan

95

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 31-point gap between the two loudest voices.

64IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 31 pts apart
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    95
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    78
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    65
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    64

Lowest 64 · highest 95 · gap 31

Also screened — no listing found

  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • California Proposition 65

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 55% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      85

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen95 on 0–100→95
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan78 on 0–100→78
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors65 on 0–100→65
    • IARC Monographs64 on 0–100→64
    Average of 95 · 94 · 78 · 65 · 64pillar72

    Raters split here, so this 72 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    78/100

    Flagged 2 of 11 ingredients: 1 restricted, 1 of concern.

    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • TITANIUM DIOXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 9 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 17 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice4 positions →
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
    • Titanium Dioxide5 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·10 of 11 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 10 of 11 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Water/Aqua/Eau→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Cellulose Acetate→film formingfilm formingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Fragrance/Parfum→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Bambusa Arundinacea Stem Extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Tetrasodium Iminodisuccinate→chelatingchelatingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Maltodextrin→film formingabsorbentbindingfilm formingabsorbentbindingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Titanium Dioxide→uv filteruv absorbercolorantuv filteruv absorbercolorant8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Iron Oxides (CI 77491→—Not in our sourcesNo data