Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Obagi/NECK AND DÉCOLLETÉ CONCENTRATE
O
Obagi

NECK AND DÉCOLLETÉ CONCENTRATE

uncategorized

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 58–82

64▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

57-point split

58

Scan

25

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 24-point gap between the two loudest voices.

58Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
82Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 24 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    58
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    82

Lowest 58 · highest 82 · gap 24

Coverage & match quality

2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan58 on 0–100→58
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen82 on 0–100→82
Average of 58 · 82pillar64

Raters split here, so this 64 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

58/100

Flagged 5 of 25 ingredients: 3 restricted, 1 of concern.

  • N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE / SODIUM HYDROXIDEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • RetinolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

Starts at 100; 21 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 57 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·24 of 25 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 24 of 25 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
water→antiplaqueskin conditioningsolventantiplaqueskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
methyl propanediol→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
alcohol denat→fragranceantimicrobialantifoamingfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
dimethicone→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
isocetyl stearoyl stearate→emollientskin conditioningviscosity controllingemollientskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
cococaprylate/caprate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
isononyl isononanoate→emollientantistaticskin conditioningemollientantistaticskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
alpha-arbutin→antioxidantbleachingskin conditioningantioxidantbleachingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
niacinamide→smoothingsmoothingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
pentylene glycol→skin conditioningsolventskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
phenoxyethanol→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
polyacrylate crosspolymer-6→emulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
malonic acid→bufferingbufferingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
sodium hydroxide→bufferingdenaturantbufferingdenaturant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
carbomer→emulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
retinyl palmitate→skin conditioningskin conditioning9/10Carcinogen-linked· flagged by 5 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
zinc carbonate→opacifyingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
acrylates/C10-30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer→film formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingfilm formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
disodium EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
helianthus annuus seed oil→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
cupric carbonate→—Not in our sourcesNo data
amodimethicone→antistatichair conditioningantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
T-butyl alcohol→perfumingdenaturantsolventperfumingdenaturantsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
tocopherol→fragranceantioxidantskin conditioningfragranceantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
parfum→perfumingfragranceperfumingfragrance4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced