Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Maternatura.it/Spray Rinfrescante Capelli al Mare al Pompelmo Rosa
Spray Rinfrescante Capelli al Mare al Pompelmo Rosa
Maternatura.it

Spray Rinfrescante Capelli al Mare al Pompelmo Rosa

hair

Your composite

80OUT OF 100Good

range 74–100

80▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

26-point split

74

Scan

100

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 26-point gap between the two loudest voices.

74Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 26 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    74
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    88
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80

Lowest 74 · highest 100 · gap 26

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan74 on 0–100→74
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–100→88
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
    Average of 74 · 100 · 88 · 80pillar80

    Raters split here, so this 80 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    74/100

    Flagged 5 of 12 ingredients: 2 restricted, 2 regulated allergens.

    • N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Mentha Piperita OilEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Eucalyptus Globulus Leaf OilEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Pinus pinaster oil and extractEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10

    Starts at 100; 8 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 26 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Good·9 of 12 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 9 of 12 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Aqua [Water→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Alcohol denat→fragranceantimicrobialantifoamingfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Mentha piperita leaf extract→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Cocos nucifera fruit extract→emollienthair conditioningskin conditioningemollienthair conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Citrus grandis peel extract→perfumingastringenttonicperfumingastringenttonicExamined, no flagReferenced
    Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract→perfumingskin conditioningperfumingskin conditioning4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeCosIng-catalogued
    Juniperus communis fruit extract→perfumingskin conditioningperfumingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Melissa officinalis leaf extract→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Pinus pinaster bark/ bud extract→uv absorberantimicrobialantioxidantuv absorberantimicrobialantioxidant4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Parfum [Fragrance→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Citric acid *from Organic Agriculture *da Agricoltura Biologica→—Not in our sourcesNo data