Lumene
Intense Precision Eyeliner
makeup
Cleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Raters agree- 85
- 100
- 100
- 98
Also screened — no listing found
- California Proposition 65
- IARC Monographs
- ECHA SVHC Candidate List
- US NTP Report on Carcinogens
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
Also screened — no listing found
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–10085
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan100 on 0–100100
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100100
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen98 on 0–10098
Average of 85 · 100 · 100 · 98pillar96
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
100/100
No EU-regulated hazards recognized among 18 ingredients.
Starts at 100; 18 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 2 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Laborno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust18 of 18 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 18 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| AQUAsolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| BUTYLENE GLYCOLfragrancehumectantskin conditioning | fragrancehumectantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| PENTYLENE GLYCOLskin conditioningsolvent | skin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| METHYLPROPANEDIOLsolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| TROMETHAMINEfragrancebuffering | fragrancebuffering | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| CITRIC ACIDfragrancechelatingbuffering | fragrancechelatingbuffering | Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| PHENOXYETHANOLpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERINdeodorantskin conditioning | deodorantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| OLEYL ALCOHOLperfumingfragranceemollient | perfumingfragranceemollient | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| MAGNESIUM ALUMINUM SILICATEabsorbentanticakingopacifying | absorbentanticakingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| STEARIC ACIDfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilising | fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| GLYCERYL STEARATEemollientsurfactant - emulsifying | emollientsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| CELLULOSEabsorbentopacifyingbulking | absorbentopacifyingbulking | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| HECTORITEabsorbentbulkingviscosity controlling | absorbentbulkingviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| XANTHAN GUMbindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | bindingemulsion stabilisinggel forming | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| ACRYLATES/C10-30 ALKYL ACRYLATE CROSSPOLYMERfilm formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controlling | film formingemulsion stabilisingviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| TOCOPHEROLfragranceantioxidantskin conditioning | fragranceantioxidantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| IRON OXIDES | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |