Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Davines/MOMO Conditioner
MOMO Conditioner
Davines

MOMO Conditioner

uncategorized

Your composite

63OUT OF 100Fair

range 52–100

63▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

48-point split

52

Scan

100

Precautionary

82

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 48-point gap between the two loudest voices.

52Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 48 pts apart
  • IARC MonographsGovernmentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    52
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    82
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    70
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    60

Lowest 52 · highest 100 · gap 48

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • IARC Monographs82 on 0–100→82
    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan52 on 0–100→52
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen82 on 0–100→82
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist70 on 0–100→70
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–100→60
    Average of 82 · 52 · 100 · 82 · 70 · 60pillar63

    Raters split here, so this 63 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    52/100

    Flagged 6 of 31 ingredients: 3 restricted, 1 of concern, 2 regulated allergens.

    • BEHENTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1) / STRARTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • Benzyl AlcoholEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • N,N-BIS(2-HYDROXYETHYL)- P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE SULFATEEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • CoumarinEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

    Starts at 100; 25 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 48 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·28 of 31 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 28 of 31 listed ingredients; 3 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    AQUA / WATER / EAU→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CETEARYL ALCOHOL→emollientemulsion stabilisingopacifyingemollientemulsion stabilisingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CETYL ALCOHOL→fragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingfragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    GLYCERYL STEARATE→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BEHENTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE→preservativeantistatichair conditioningpreservativeantistatichair conditioning4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    C12-15 ALKYL BENZOATE→antimicrobialemollientskin conditioningantimicrobialemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    CETRIMONIUM CHLORIDE→preservativeantimicrobialantistaticpreservativeantimicrobialantistatic4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    PARFUM / FRAGRANCE→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    INULIN→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BENZOTRIAZOLYL DODECYL P-CRESOL→uv absorberuv absorberNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    BENZYL ALCOHOL→preservativeperfumingsolventpreservativeperfumingsolvent6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    MYRISTYL ALCOHOL→emollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - foam boostingemollientemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - foam boostingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF JUICE→skin conditioningskin conditioning4/10IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    POLYGLYCERYL-2 STEARATE→surfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL / SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS SEED OIL→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SODIUM GLUCONATE→chelatingskin conditioningchelatingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    STEARYL ALCOHOL→fragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingfragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SCLEROTIUM GUM→emulsion stabilisingskin conditioningviscosity controllingemulsion stabilisingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SODIUM BENZOATE→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    LACTIC ACID→humectantbufferingskin conditioninghumectantbufferingskin conditioning4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    BUTYLENE GLYCOL→fragrancehumectantskin conditioningfragrancehumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    OCTADECYL DI-T-BUTYL-4-HYDROXYHYDROCINNAMATE→antioxidantantioxidantNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    PRUNUS ARMENIACA FRUIT EXTRACT / PRUNUS ARMENIACA FRUIT EXTRACT→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    ALCOHOL DENAT→fragranceantimicrobialantifoamingfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    CITRIC ACID→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    CI 19140 / YELLOW 5→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    CI 61570 / GREEN 5→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    SODIUM PHYTATE→chelatingoral carechelatingoral careNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CI 17200 / RED 33→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    COUMARIN→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced