Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Stirling Soap Company/Frozen Tundra - Post-Shave Balm
Frozen Tundra - Post-Shave Balm
Stirling Soap Company

Frozen Tundra - Post-Shave Balm

uncategorized

Your composite

83OUT OF 100Good

range 80–85

83
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Raters agree
  • Health Canada Ingredient HotlistGovernmentunverified match
    85
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    80

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist85 on 0–100→85
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)80 on 0–100→80
    Average of 85 · 80pillar83

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Fair·13 of 23 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 13 of 23 listed ingredients; 10 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Hamamelis Virginiana→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Aloe Barbadensis Left Juice→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Cetyl Stearyl Alcohol & Polysorbate 60→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Limnanthes Alba Seed Oil→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Myristyl Myristate→emollientopacifyingskin conditioningemollientopacifyingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Vitis Vinifera Seed Oil→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Butyrospermum Parkii→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Phenoxyethanol & Caprylyl Glycol & Sorbic Acid→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Tocopheryl Acetate→antioxidantskin conditioningantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Stearic Acid→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Cocos Nucifera Oil→perfumingfragrancehair conditioningperfumingfragrancehair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Allantoin→soothingskin conditioningskin protectingsoothingskin conditioningskin protectingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Menthol→fragrancedenaturantrefreshingfragrancedenaturantrefreshingNo flags in our sourcesReferenced
    Wintergreen Oil→—6/10EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Ylang Ylang Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Myroxylon Balsamum Resin Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Carum Carvi L. Oil→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Salvia Sclarea Oil→fragrancetonicfragrancetonicNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Abies Sibirica Oil→perfumingfragrancetonicperfumingfragrancetonicNo flags in our sourcesReferenced
    Parmelia Periata→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    Evernia Prunastri→—Not in our sourcesNo data