Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Living Proof/Full Conditioner + Refill
Full Conditioner + Refill
Living Proof

Full Conditioner + Refill

uncategorized

Your composite

64OUT OF 100Fair

range 56–88

64▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

44-point split

56

Scan

100

Precautionary

88

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 32-point gap between the two loudest voices.

56Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 32 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    56
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    88

Lowest 56 · highest 88 · gap 32

Coverage & match quality

2 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan56 on 0–100→56
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen88 on 0–100→88
Average of 56 · 88pillar64

Raters split here, so this 64 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

56/100

Flagged 8 of 23 ingredients: 2 restricted, 1 of concern, 4 regulated allergens.

  • BEHENTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE (1)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
  • ETHYL LAUROYL ARGINATE HCLEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
  • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • Hexyl CinnamalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
  • CitronellolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

Starts at 100; 16 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 44 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Laborno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·22 of 23 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 22 of 23 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Water/Eau/Aqua→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Cetyl Alcohol→fragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingfragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Behentrimonium Chloride→preservativeantistatichair conditioningpreservativeantistatichair conditioning4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
C13-15 Alkane→solventsolventExamined, no flagReferenced
Polyglyceryl-3 Methylglucose Distearate→surfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Isopentyldiol→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride→film formingantistaticskin conditioningfilm formingantistaticskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Polyricinoleic Acid→bindingplasticiserviscosity controllingbindingplasticiserviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Glycerin→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Polyglyceryl-3 Betainate Acetate→—Not in our sourcesNo data
Sodium PCA→humectantantistatichair conditioninghumectantantistatichair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Caesalpinia Spinosa Gum→film formingskin conditioningviscosity controllingfilm formingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
Hydroxyethylcellulose→film formingbindingemulsion stabilisingfilm formingbindingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose→film formingantistaticbindingfilm formingantistaticbindingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Fragrance/Parfum→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Citric Acid→fragrancechelatingbufferingfragrancechelatingbuffering4/10Health Canada Hotlist — restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Hydroxyacetophenone→antioxidantantioxidantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Caprylyl Glycol→emollientdeodoranthair conditioningemollientdeodoranthair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
Ethyl Lauroyl Arginate HCl→preservativeanti-seborrheichair conditioningpreservativeanti-seborrheichair conditioning4/10EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Limonene→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Hexyl Cinnamal→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Linalool→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
Citronellol→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced