Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 32-point gap between the two loudest voices.
Lowest 56 · highest 88 · gap 32
Coverage & match quality
4 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
no black box
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
Raters split here, so this 64 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
Flagged 8 of 30 ingredients: 2 restricted, 1 of concern, 4 regulated allergens.
Starts at 100; 23 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 42 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
Data availability
Robust29 of 30 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 29 of 30 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aqua/Water/Eau | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| Isocetyl Stearoyl Stearateemollientskin conditioningviscosity controlling | emollientskin conditioningviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Polyglyceryl-3 Diisostearatesurfactant - emulsifying | surfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| C9-12 Alkanesolvent | solvent | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Caprylic/Capric Triglycerideperfumingfragranceskin conditioning | perfumingfragranceskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Octyldodecanolperfumingfragranceemollient | perfumingfragranceemollient | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Lauroyl Lysinehair conditioningskin conditioningviscosity controlling | hair conditioningskin conditioningviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Propanediolsolventviscosity controlling | solventviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Magnesium Stearatecolorantanticakingmoisturising | colorantanticakingmoisturising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Isostearic Acidbindingcleansingsurfactant - cleansing | bindingcleansingsurfactant - cleansing | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Disteardimonium Hectoritelight stabilizerviscosity controlling | light stabilizerviscosity controlling | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Coco- Caprylate/Caprateemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Alcohol Denatfragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | fragranceantimicrobialantifoaming | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Phenoxyethanolpreservativeantimicrobial | preservativeantimicrobial | Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Ascorbyl Glucosideantioxidant | antioxidant | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Ethylhexylglycerindeodorantskin conditioning | deodorantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Micacolorantanticakingopacifying | colorantanticakingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Sodium Metabisulfitepreservativeantioxidantreducing | preservativeantioxidantreducing | EU-restricted (with limits)· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Parfum/Fragrance | Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced | |
| Tocopheryl Acetateantioxidantskin conditioning | antioxidantskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Linaloolperfumingdeodorant | perfumingdeodorant | EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Limoneneperfumingdeodorantsolvent | perfumingdeodorantsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Benzyl Benzoateperfumingantimicrobialsolvent | perfumingantimicrobialsolvent | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Tin Oxideabrasiveopacifyingbulking | abrasiveopacifyingbulking | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Citralperfumingflavouring | perfumingflavouring | ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Hexyl Cinnamal [+/- CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide | Not in our sources | No data | |
| CI 77492/Iron Oxides | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| CI 77499/Iron Oxides | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized | |
| CI 77491/Iron Oxides | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |