Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/TIRTIR Official/Flawless Pore Prep Primer
Flawless Pore Prep Primer
TIRTIR Official

Flawless Pore Prep Primer

makeup$22 MSRPGTIN 8800349020545
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+25 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 2483 cleaner options →5 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

70OUT OF 100Fair

range 65–80

75▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
64
Pkg

Why this score

11-point split

84

Scan

95

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

2483 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 30-point gap between the two loudest voices.

65ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 2483 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

30 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Packaging

    • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    What we know about the packaging

    Unidentified·0 of 2 identified

    None of the 2 packaging components is identified beyond its broad material, so the packaging score is a stand-in — not a reading of this container.

    • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

    This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

    How we know the packaging

    Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

    The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·34 of 34 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 34 listed ingredients.

    Worth a look (3)

    • CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide8/10raters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • Rosa Damascena Flower Water4/10fragrance · skin conditioning · skin protectingraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    • Mentha Piperita Leaf Extract4/10skin conditioningraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (31)

    • Aqua/Water/Eau
    • Dimethiconerich occlusive
    • Silica
    • Trisiloxane
    • Propanediol
    • Polyglyceryl-3 Polydimethylsiloxyethyl Dimethicone
    • Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate
    • Glycerinhumectant
    • Caprylyl Methicone
    • 1,2-Hexanediol
    • Disteardimonium Hectorite
    • Dimethicone/Polyglycerin-3 Crosspolymer
    • Mica
    • Magnesium Sulfate
    • Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer
    • Silica Silylate
    • Ethylhexylglycerin
    • Octadecane
    • Guaiazulenefragrance material
    • Lactic Acid/Glycolic Acid Copolymer
    • Butylene Glycol
    • Chamomilla Recutita Flower Water
    • Sodium Citrate
    • Zingiber Officinale Root Extract
    • Enantia Chlorantha Bark Extract
    • Tocopherol
    • Leuconostoc/Radish Root Ferment Filtrate
    • Caprylyl Glycol
    • Xanthan Gum
    • Silybum Marianum Extract
    • Oleanolic Acid
    What these ingredient tags mean (2)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • rich occlusiveDimethicone

      • Dimethicone: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
    • humectantGlycerin

      • Glycerin: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".