Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Labo Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher/Coconut Moisturizing Hand Cream
Coconut Moisturizing Hand Cream
Labo Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher

Coconut Moisturizing Hand Cream

uncategorized

Your composite

73OUT OF 100Good

range 60–100

73▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

18-point split

82

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No category on file, so no fair comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 40 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    82
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    60

Lowest 60 · highest 100 · gap 40

Also screened — no listing found

  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Recognized on a safer-ingredients list

  • US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) — 60% of ingredients recognized

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    4 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan82 on 0–100→82
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–100→60
    Average of 82 · 100 · 100 · 60pillar73

    Raters split here, so this 73 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    82/100

    Flagged 3 of 20 ingredients: 1 of concern, 2 regulated allergens.

    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • CoumarinEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Hexyl CinnamalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3

    Starts at 100; 17 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 18 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·18 of 20 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 18 of 20 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Natural Ingredients→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    AQUA/WATER/EAU→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE→perfumingfragranceskin conditioningperfumingfragranceskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SORBITAN STEARATE→surfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CENTAUREA CYANUS FLOWER WATER→skin conditioningskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    METHYL GLUCOSE SESQUISTEARATE→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingskin conditioningemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    STEARIC ACID→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PALMITIC ACID→emollientsurfactant - emulsifyingemollientsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER→skin conditioningviscosity controllingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    COCOS NUCIFERA OIL→perfumingfragrancehair conditioningperfumingfragrancehair conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    XANTHAN GUM→bindingemulsion stabilisinggel formingbindingemulsion stabilisinggel formingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CITRIC ACID Synthetic Ingredients→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    PARFUM/FRAGRANCE→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    HYDROXYACETOPHENONE→antioxidantantioxidantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SORBIC ACID→preservativefragrancepreservativefragranceNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    COUMARIN→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    HEXYL CINNAMAL→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    SODIUM BENZOATE→preservativefragranceanticorrosivepreservativefragranceanticorrosiveNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized