Cetaphil
Exfoliating Rough & Bumpy Cream
skincareGTIN 302990410341
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.
15Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs60ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientCleaner options
See 12 cleaner alternatives
Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
Split · 45 pts apart- 15
- 25
- 55
- 60
Lowest 15 · highest 60 · gap 45
Also screened — no listing found
- Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
- California Proposition 65
- IARC Monographs
- ECHA SVHC Candidate List
- US NTP Report on Carcinogens
- EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Recognized on a safer-ingredients list
Environmental
- 90
Labor
- 30
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
no black box
How this score is built
no black box
How this score is built
We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.
- 1
Collect each rater's own score
Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.
- 2
Normalize to 0–100, higher = better
Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.
- 3
Average per axis, but keep the spread
Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.
- 4
Your weights make the overall
The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.
worked example · Ingredient safety
- Greenlens Ingredient Scan15 on 0–10015
- Greenlens Tolerance Screen25 on 0–10025
- Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–10055
- ANSES Endocrine Disruptors60 on 0–10060
Average of 15 · 25 · 55 · 60pillar27
Raters split here, so this 27 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.
Why the safety score
Greenlens Ingredient Scan
Independent · EU regulatory reference
15/100
Flagged 3 of 15 ingredients: 1 prohibited, 1 restricted, 1 of concern. Score capped: a prohibited (banned) substance is present.
Penalties alone would give 23, but a prohibited substance is present, so the score is capped at 15 — a genuine hazard isn’t diluted away by a long ingredient list.
- (2 -Isopropylpent-4-enoyl)urea (apronalide)EU Cosmetics Regulation Annex II (prohibited)−55
- MethylparabenCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
- PropylparabenEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.
Why this score
Every ingredient, under all three lenses
The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 40 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust15 of 15 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.
| Ingredient | What it does | Safety | Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waterantiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | antiplaqueskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Ureahumectantantistaticbuffering | humectantantistaticbuffering | EU-prohibited· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagree | Well-characterized |
| Cetyl Lactateemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Myristyl Lactateemollientskin conditioning | emollientskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | CosIng-catalogued |
| Glycerinperfuminghumectantdenaturant | perfuminghumectantdenaturant | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Propylene Glycolhumectantskin conditioningsolvent | humectantskin conditioningsolvent | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Prunus Amygdalus Dulcis Oilskin conditioning | skin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Glyceryl Stearateemollientsurfactant - emulsifying | emollientsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Cetearyl Alcoholemollientemulsion stabilisingopacifying | emollientemulsion stabilisingopacifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Cetyl Alcoholfragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | fragranceemollientemulsion stabilising | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Ceteareth-20cleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | cleansingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifying | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Dimethiconeemollientantifoamingskin conditioning | emollientantifoamingskin conditioning | No flags in our sources | Well-characterized |
| Carbomeremulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling | emulsion stabilisinggel formingviscosity controlling | EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Methylparabenpreservativefragrance | preservativefragrance | Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |
| Propylparabenpreservativeperfuming | preservativeperfuming | Endocrine-active· flagged by 4 of 9raters disagree | Referenced |