Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Cetaphil/Sheer Mineral* Sunscreen Stick SPF 50
Sheer Mineral* Sunscreen Stick SPF 50
Cetaphil

Sheer Mineral* Sunscreen Stick SPF 50

sunGTIN 302994108008

Your composite

59OUT OF 100Fair

range 54–69

68▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

45-point split

88

Scan

55

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 45-point gap between the two loudest voices.

55Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 45 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    88
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    55
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80

Lowest 55 · highest 100 · gap 45

Also screened — no listing found

  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

  • EU Microplastics RestrictionGovernmentunverified match
    78

Labor

  • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
    30

Coverage & match quality

6 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

no black box

How this score is built

We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

  1. 1

    Collect each rater's own score

    Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

  2. 2

    Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

    Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

  3. 3

    Average per axis, but keep the spread

    Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

  4. 4

    Your weights make the overall

    The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

worked example · Ingredient safety

  • Greenlens Ingredient Scan88 on 0–100→88
  • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
  • Greenlens Precautionary Screen55 on 0–100→55
  • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
Average of 88 · 100 · 55 · 80pillar68

Raters split here, so this 68 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

Why the safety score

Greenlens Ingredient Scan

Independent · EU regulatory reference

88/100

Flagged 1 of 19 ingredients: 1 of concern.

  • BHT / BHACommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

Starts at 100; 18 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

Why this score

Every ingredient, under all three lenses

The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 45 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

All three lenses →

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Good·15 of 19 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 15 of 19 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
Titanium dioxide 6→—Not in our sourcesNo data
zinc oxide 4.7→—Not in our sourcesNo data
aluminum hydroxide→humectantemollientopacifyinghumectantemollientopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
beeswax→fragrancebindingemulsion stabilisingfragrancebindingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
bht→fragranceantioxidantfragranceantioxidant7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
butyloctyl salicylate→hair conditioningskin conditioningsolventhair conditioningskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
c12-15 alkyl benzoate→antimicrobialemollientskin conditioningantimicrobialemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
cetyl alcohol→fragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingfragranceemollientemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
dimethicone→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
euphorbia cerifera wax→—Not in our sourcesNo data
isostearic acid→bindingcleansingsurfactant - cleansingbindingcleansingsurfactant - cleansingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
neopentyl glycol diethylhexanoate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
ozokerite→bindingemulsion stabilisingopacifyingbindingemulsion stabilisingopacifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
paraffin→perfumingskin conditioningviscosity controllingperfumingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
polyethylene→film formingabrasiveviscosity controllingfilm formingabrasiveviscosity controlling4/10EU microplastics-restricted· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
stearic acid→fragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingfragrancecleansingemulsion stabilisingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
tocopheryl acetate→antioxidantskin conditioningantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
triethoxycaprylylsilane→bindingbindingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
container-96d1d0e75f21a6ab772b6ac3d0 .pd-slider→—Not in our sourcesNo data