Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Garnier/Fructis Curl Sculpt Conditioning Cream Gel - Garnier
Fructis Curl Sculpt Conditioning Cream Gel - Garnier
Garnier

Fructis Curl Sculpt Conditioning Cream Gel - Garnier

skincare

Your composite

40OUT OF 100Poor

range 28–75

25▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

52-point split

42

Scan

54

Precautionary

94

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 94-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
94Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 94 pts apart
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    42
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    94
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    54
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    0
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    60

Lowest 0 · highest 94 · gap 94

Also screened — no listing found

  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • California Proposition 65
  • IARC Monographs
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      55

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan42 on 0–100→42
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen94 on 0–100→94
    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen54 on 0–100→54
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors0 on 0–100→0
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)60 on 0–100→60
    Average of 42 · 94 · 54 · 0 · 60pillar25

    Raters split here, so this 25 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    42/100

    Flagged 10 of 25 ingredients: 1 restricted, 3 of concern, 5 regulated allergens.

    • MethylparabenCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • Trialkylamines, trialkanolamines and their saltsEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III (restricted)−10
    • LimoneneEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • LinaloolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • GeraniolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • MethylparabenCommon transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12
    • CitralEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Amyl CinnamalEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−0

    Starts at 100; 16 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 52 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·24 of 25 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 24 of 25 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Coconut water 1031224 F10 AQUA/WATER/EAU→—Not in our sourcesNo data
    DIMETHICONE→emollientantifoamingskin conditioningemollientantifoamingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    GLYCERIN→perfuminghumectantdenaturantperfuminghumectantdenaturantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    SORBITOL→perfumingfragrancehumectantperfumingfragrancehumectantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PROPYLENE GLYCOL→humectantskin conditioningsolventhumectantskin conditioningsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PEG/PPG-4/12 DIMETHICONE→surfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    GUAR HYDROXYPROPYLTRIMONIUM CHLORIDE→film formingantistaticskin conditioningfilm formingantistaticskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    PHENOXYETHANOL→preservativeantimicrobialpreservativeantimicrobial4/10Mild sensitizer for some· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    PPG-1 TRIDECETH-6→surfactant - cleansingskin conditioningsurfactant - cleansingskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    PEG-70 MANGO GLYCERIDES→surfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    ETHYLPARABEN→preservativefragrancepreservativefragrance7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    TRIETHANOLAMINE→fragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansingfragrancebufferingsurfactant - cleansing8/10ANSES CMR-listed· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    POLYQUATERNIUM-37→film formingantistaticfilm formingantistaticNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    LIMONENE→perfumingdeodorantsolventperfumingdeodorantsolvent7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    LINALOOL→perfumingdeodorantperfumingdeodorant6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    PVP→film formingantistaticbindingfilm formingantistaticbindingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PARFUM / FRAGRANCE→—4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    PERSEA GRATISSIMA OIL/AVOCADO OIL→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    PARAFFINUM LIQUIDUM/ MINERAL OIL/HUILE MINERALE→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    GERANIOL→perfumingtonicperfumingtonic6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    DISODIUM EDTA→chelatingviscosity controllingchelatingviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    METHYLPARABEN→preservativefragrancepreservativefragrance7/10Endocrine-active· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER/SHEA BUTTER→—No flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    CITRAL→perfumingflavouringperfumingflavouring7/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 3 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    AMYL CINNAMAL→perfumingperfuming4/10EU-regulated fragrance allergen· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced