Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyOpen data via Open Beauty Facts · no EWG/Yuka scraping
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/NIVEA/Hyaluron Moisture Plus Lip Balm
Hyaluron Moisture Plus Lip Balm
NIVEA

Hyaluron Moisture Plus Lip Balm

skincareGTIN 4005900996602

Your composite

58OUT OF 100Fair

range 55–65

85▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

18-point split

82

Scan

100

Precautionary

100

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

12 found

See better →

Flagged

3 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.

80ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs
100Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Cleaner options

See 12 cleaner alternatives

Same category, ranked by ingredient safety, never by affiliate payout.

See better →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

Split · 20 pts apart
  • Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependentunverified match
    100
  • ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernmentunverified match
    80
  • Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependentunverified match
    82
  • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Governmentunverified match
    90

Lowest 80 · highest 100 · gap 20

Also screened — no listing found

  • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
  • ECHA SVHC Candidate List
  • IARC Monographs
  • US NTP Report on Carcinogens
  • California Proposition 65

Environmental

    Also screened — no listing found

    • EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Cruelty-Free CertificationNonprofitunverified match
      30

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    no black box

    How this score is built

    We don't rate products ourselves. We collect what each public rater already says, put every scale on common ground, and keep the disagreements visible instead of averaging them away.

    1. 1

      Collect each rater's own score

      Every source keeps its native verdict for this product. We never invent a score for an axis a source didn't measure.

    2. 2

      Normalize to 0–100, higher = better

      Raters can use different scales and directions: some where a low number means safe, some where a high one does. We map them all onto one 0–100 axis and flip the ones that run backwards so the numbers are finally comparable.

    3. 3

      Average per axis, but keep the spread

      Scores on the same axis become one representative number (their mean). When raters split by 20+ points we flag it and keep every rater's number. A disagreement is never blended into silence.

    4. 4

      Your weights make the overall

      The ring is the weighted average of the four pillars using your weights. It's computed fresh every time and never stored, so there's no hidden “objective” default.

    worked example · Ingredient safety

    • Greenlens Precautionary Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • Greenlens Tolerance Screen100 on 0–100→100
    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors80 on 0–100→80
    • Greenlens Ingredient Scan82 on 0–100→82
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)90 on 0–100→90
    Average of 100 · 100 · 80 · 82 · 90pillar85

    Raters split here, so this 85 is a midpoint, not a consensus. The spread stays on the “every rater” list above.

    Why the safety score

    Greenlens Ingredient Scan

    Independent · EU regulatory reference

    82/100

    Flagged 3 of 15 ingredients: 1 of concern, 2 regulated allergens.

    • CitronellolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • GeraniolEU Cosmetics Regulation Annex III / Reg. (EU) 2023/1545 (labelled fragrance allergen)−3
    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)Common transparency/sensitization concern (not a regulatory ban)−12

    Starts at 100; 12 other ingredients carried no recognized regulated hazard. Absence of a flag means no regulated hazard was recognized — not proof of safety. This is one lens; see where raters disagree above.

    Why this score

    Every ingredient, under all three lenses

    The Scan is one opinion. The strict and lenient lenses read the same list and land 18 points apart. See what each one flags, and what it costs.

    All three lenses →

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Flagged ingredients

    • Fragrance / Parfum (undisclosed)3 positions →
    • Citronellol4 positions →
    • Geraniol4 positions →

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·15 of 15 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on all 15 listed ingredients.

    Every listed ingredient: its function, where our safety lists land, and whether our sources have data on it.
    IngredientWhat it doesSafetyData
    Aqua→solventsolventNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Behenyl Behenate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Butyrospermum Parkii Butter→skin conditioningviscosity controllingskin conditioningviscosity controllingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Helianthus Annuus Seed Cera→emollientemollientNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Diisostearoyl Polyglyceryl-3 Dimer Dilinoleate→emollientskin conditioningemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Sodium Hyaluronate→humectantskin conditioninghumectantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Centella Asiatica Extract→cleansingsmoothingsoothingcleansingsmoothingsoothingNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Tocopherol→fragranceantioxidantskin conditioningfragranceantioxidantskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Ascorbyl Palmitate→fragranceantioxidantfragranceantioxidantNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Copernicia Cerifera Cera→film formingemollientskin conditioningfilm formingemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil→fragranceemollientskin conditioningfragranceemollientskin conditioningNo flags in our sourcesWell-characterized
    Polyglyceryl-4 Diisostearate/Polyhydroxystearate/Sebacate→emulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingemulsion stabilisingsurfactant - cleansingsurfactant - emulsifyingNo flags in our sourcesCosIng-catalogued
    Citronellol→perfumingperfuming6/10ANSES endocrine candidate· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Geraniol→perfumingtonicperfumingtonic6/10EU harmonised skin sensitizer· flagged by 2 of 9raters disagreeReferenced
    Aroma→flavouringflavouring4/10Transparency concern· flagged by 1 of 9raters disagreeReferenced