Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Garnier/Honey Water Moisture Restoring Conditioner
Honey Water Moisture Restoring Conditioner
Garnier · owned by L'Oréal

Honey Water Moisture Restoring Conditioner

hair$6.49 MSRPGTIN 603084088591

Your composite

51OUT OF 100Poor

No safety data

—
Safety
—
Eco
55
Labor
46
Pkg
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

Nothing beats this on safety.

Flagged

5 ingredients

What's flagged →

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

    Finding shown, score not counted — partial label

    • ANSES Endocrine Disruptors flagged an ingredient
    • Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist flagged an ingredient
    • EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) flagged an ingredient

    This finding stands: the ingredient it names really is on the list we hold. Its 0-100 score does not count toward the pillar, because we only hold part of this label, and a partial list can only ever score too generously.

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens

    ✓Recognized on a safer-ingredients list: US EPA Safer Choice recognizes 55% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.

    Environmental

      ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

      Labor

      • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates Garnier as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →

      Packaging

      • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. We started showing this score on Sep 11, 2026. about this rater →

      Coverage & match quality

      2 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

      • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
      • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

      Weighted by what you care about

      Tune your weights

      composite recomputes live

      +
      Ingredient safetyno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      Environmentalno rating

      No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

      1.0×
      1.0×
      0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

      What we know about the packaging

      Unidentified·0 of 1 identified

      Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.

      • Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.

      This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.

      How we know the packaging

      Read from the product photo, not declared by the maker — treat this score as weaker.

      The container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.

      Ingredients, decoded

      Data availability

      Partial list·20 shown

      Only part of this product's ingredient list could be read from its source, so what is shown here is incomplete. We do not publish a safety score from a partial list.

      Worth a look (5)

      • LIMONENE7/10fragrance materialperfuming · deodorant · solventraters disagree

        ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 3 of 9 lists →

      • PARFUM / FRAGRANCE6/10undeclared fragrance blendperfumingraters disagree

        Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      • BENZYL ALCOHOL6/10fragrance materialpreservative · perfuming · solventraters disagree

        EU harmonised skin sensitizer · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

      • TARTARIC ACID4/10fragrance · bufferingraters disagree

        Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      • CITRIC ACID4/10fragrance · chelating · bufferingraters disagree

        Health Canada Hotlist — restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists →

      ✓No flags in our sources (15)

      • AQUA / WATER / EAU
      • CETEARYL ALCOHOL
      • STEARAMIDOPROPYL DIMETHYLAMINE
      • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATEcomedogenic in testing
      • CETYL ESTERS
      • HELIANTHUS ANNUUS SEED OIL / SUNFLOWER SEED OIL
      • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
      • BENZOIC ACID
      • MEL / HONEY / MIEL
      • SODIUM CHLORIDE
      • GLYCERINhumectant
      • CARAMELfragrance material
      • MEL EXTRACT / HONEY EXTRACT
      • SODIUM BENZOATE
      • ROSE EXTRACT
      What these ingredient tags mean (4)

      These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

      • comedogenic in testingISOPROPYL MYRISTATE

        • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE: A light emollient, and the ester the rabbit-ear literature names first. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.
      • fragrance materialBENZYL ALCOHOL, LIMONENE

        • BENZYL ALCOHOL: Used both as a fragrance component and as a preservative; the EU names it either way. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 45: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (38), which is footnote (37) plus a condition: stock that does not comply may still be made available until 31 July 2028 only "provided that they comply with the restrictions applicable on 15 August 2023", and only if it was lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off. Entry 45 covers its non-preservative use; it is separately an allowed preservative at Annex V entry 34.
        • LIMONENE: A citrus-smelling fragrance component named separately on the label; the one name covers three related isomers. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009, Annex III entry 88: a fragrance substance whose presence must be indicated in the list of ingredients above 0,001% in leave-on and 0,01% in rinse-off products, because of established contact-allergy risk. That entry carries transition footnote (37): stock that does not comply, lawfully placed on the Union market before the 31 July 2026 cut-off, may still be made available until 31 July 2028. It is marked on the racemic dl-limonene/Dipentene line and the (S)-(l-limonene) line, but NOT the (R)-p-mentha-1,8-diene (d-limonene) line, CAS 5989-27-5, whose duty was already running as entry 88 before Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and so needed no transition. All three isomers are declared under the single glossary name "Limonene", so that name on a label does not identify which of them is present.
      • undeclared fragrance blendPARFUM / FRAGRANCE

        • PARFUM / FRAGRANCE: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.
      • humectantGLYCERIN

        • GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".