Cetaphil
Gentle Skin Cleanser
cleanser16ozGTIN 302993917014
Cleaner pick · Safest cleansers & exfoliants we have rated
Sodashi
CLAY CLEANSER WITH LAVENDER Travel Size+53 on ingredient safety
16 AUD
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 54-point gap between the two loudest voices.
34Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs88Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 3876 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
54 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: IARC Monographs · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
US EPA Safer Choice (SCIL) recognizes 56% of ingredients as safer choices — a marker, never a score.
Environmental
Run by a nonprofit. Match to this product confirmed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Packaging
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 4 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
What we know about the packaging
Unidentified0 of 1 identified
Nobody recorded what this pack is actually made of beyond “plastic”, so the packaging score is a stand-in for the middle of that range — not a reading of this container.
- Recorded only as “plastic” — no resin code. It could be PET (#1) (widely recyclable) or PVC (#3) (hard to recycle); nothing on record says which, so it counts as 46 out of 100, the middle of that range.
This says how precisely the packaging is described, not how good it is — a fully identified material can still be a bad one.
How we know the packaging
Nobody published the material for this product, so it was read from the product photo — the container looks like this, rather than the maker saying so. Treat the packaging score as weaker here than on a product with a declared material.
A photo also cannot show the resin code moulded into the base, so every plastic container reads as “plastic, unspecified” — the cautious end of the plastics range, not a finding about this particular pack.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust9 of 9 characterized
Our sources have reference data on all 9 listed ingredients.
Worth a look (4)
Endocrine-activeflagged by 3 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Endocrine-activeflagged by 4 of 9 lists →
Transparency concernflagged by 1 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (5)