P. Louise
Cheek Of It Liquid Highlighter, White Wedding
Bronzer Highlightertypically $12–30
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+72 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 72-point gap between the two loudest voices.
10ANSES Endocrine DisruptorsGovernment
vs82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 17626 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
72 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates P. Louise as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust33 of 34 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 33 of 34 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
EU-prohibitedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
ANSES CMR-listedflagged by 5 of 9 lists
Persistent / bioaccumulativeflagged by 1 of 9 lists
Mild sensitizer for someflagged by 1 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (29)
- AQUA
- PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
- DIMETHICONE
- METHYLPROPANEDIOL
- GLYCERIN
- SYNTHETIC FLUORPHLOGOPITE
- PHENYLISOPROPYL DIMETHICONE
- MICA
- CETYL PEG/PPG-10/1 DIMETHICONE
- SILICA DIMETHYL SILYLATE
- PEG-10 DIMETHICONE
- POLYGLYCERYL-2 TRIISOSTEARATE
- SODIUM CHLORIDE
- DISTEARDIMONIUM HECTORITE
- TOCOPHERYL ACETATE
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- CHLORPHENESIN
- PROPANEDIOL
- XANTHAN GUM
- TREHALOSE
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- TIN OXIDE
- SODIUM HYALURONATE
- SODIUM POLYGLUTAMATE
- HYDROXYACETOPHENONE
- 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
- UNDARIA PINNATIFIDA EXTRACT
- FRUCTOOLIGOSACCHARIDES
- CHONDRUS CRISPUS
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfreeinternational.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.