e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Blemish Fighting Putty Primer
Primer
Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated
Tarte
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick+17 on ingredient safety
$38
Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 20-point gap between the two loudest voices.
80EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)Government
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientAll 2011 cleaner options, safest first We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.
Every rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
20 pts apartA government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · IARC Monographs
Environmental
Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. This rates e.l.f. Cosmetics, Inc. as a company and applies to everything they make, not this product alone. Checked this week. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
Environmentalno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust25 of 27 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 25 of 27 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (2)
EU harmonised CMR (cat. 2)flagged by 4 of 9 lists →
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists →
No flags in our sources (23)
- WATER
- DIMETHICONErich occlusive
- PROPYLENE GLYCOLcommon irritant
- GLYCERINhumectant
- CERESIN
- PARAFFIN
- HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
- HDI/TRIMETHYLOL HEXYLLACTONE CROSSPOLYMER
- TRIMETHYLSILOXYSILICATE
- POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE
- TROMETHAMINEfragrance material
- SODIUM CHLORIDE
- DIMETHICONE/PEG-10/15 CROSSPOLYMER
- DIMETHICONE CROSSPOLYMER
- KAOLIN
- SILICA
- ORYZA SATIVA BRAN WAX
- TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
- DISODIUM EDTA
- ETHYLHEXYLGLYCERIN
- CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
- CHROMIUM OXIDE GREENS
- YELLOW IRON OXIDE
No data in our sources (2)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
What these ingredient tags mean (3)
These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.
common irritantPROPYLENE GLYCOL
- PROPYLENE GLYCOL: A solvent that shows up in patch-test clinics, more often as irritation than as allergy. American Contact Dermatitis Society, Allergen of the Year 2018 (Jacob SE, Scheman A, McGowan MA, Dermatitis 2018;29(1):3-5).
rich occlusiveDIMETHICONE
- DIMETHICONE: A silicone that forms a film on the surface of the skin without an oily feel. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(g), lists dimethicone as a skin protectant at 1 to 30%.
humectantGLYCERIN
- GLYCERIN: A humectant, and one of the two ingredients a comparison of moisturiser components found made a significant difference to skin hydration. FDA OTC skin protectant monograph, 21 CFR 347.10(h), lists glycerin as a skin protectant at 20 to 45%. On the humectant half: Jeong CB, Han JY, Cho JC, Suh KD, Nam GW, "Analysis of electrical property changes of skin by oil-in-water emulsion components", Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35(4):402-410, DOI 10.1111/ics.12059, PMID 23621673, found that "glycerine and urea showed significant skin hydration effects compared with other humectants".
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from leapingbunny.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.