Greenlens

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account
Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Flower Knows/Little Angel Cream Blush, #02 Floral Praise
Little Angel Cream Blush, #02 Floral Praise
Flower Knows

Little Angel Cream Blush, #02 Floral Praise

Blush
maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

Cleaner pick · Safest face we have rated

Tarte

maracuja juicy blush & bronzer multi-stick

+32 on ingredient safety

$38

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 9642 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

68OUT OF 100Fair

Ingredient safety only

range 60–95

68▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
—
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

35-point split

60

Scan

95

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

9642 found

See better →

Flagged

4 ingredients

What's flagged →

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 35-point gap between the two loudest voices.

60Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 9642 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

35 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. This score changed Sep 1, 2026: source data updated. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · California Proposition 65 · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Coverage & match quality

    5 ratings · 1 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Laborno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·36 of 37 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 36 of 37 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (4)

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists →

    • CI 733604/10colorantraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists →

    ✓No flags in our sources (32)

    • ISONONYL ISONONANOATE
    • BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
    • SILICA
    • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
    • POLYBUTENE
    • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
    • ISOAMYL LAURATE
    • SYNTHETIC WAX
    • VINYL DIMETHICONE/METHICONE SILSESQUIOXANE CROSSPOLYMER
    • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAX
    • POLYGLYCERYL-2 TRIISOSTEARATE
    • ACRYLATES/STEARYL ACRYLATE/DIMETHICONE METHACRYLATE COPOLYMER
    • POLYHYDROXYSTEARIC ACID
    • ETHYLENE/PROPYLENE COPOLYMER
    • CAPRYLYL METHICONE
    • VP/HEXADECENE COPOLYMER
    • KAOLIN
    • ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE
    • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
    • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATEcomedogenic in testing
    • ISOSTEARIC ACID
    • LECITHIN
    • TRIETHOXYCAPRYLYLSILANE
    • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-3 POLYRICINOLEATE
    • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
    • POLYGLYCERYL-2 DIISOSTEARATE
    • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
    • GLYCERYL CAPRYLATE
    • LAUROYL LYSINE
    • STEARALKONIUM HECTORITE
    • PROPYLENE CARBONATE

    No data in our sources (1)

    • CI 77019

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • comedogenic in testingISOPROPYL MYRISTATE

      • ISOPROPYL MYRISTATE: A light emollient, and the ester the rabbit-ear literature names first. Fulton JE Jr, Pay SR, Fulton JE 3rd, "Comedogenicity of current therapeutic products, cosmetics, and ingredients in the rabbit ear", J Am Acad Dermatol 1984;10(1):96-105, PMID 6229554. The openly readable abstract names this ingredient among its "ingredient offenders", in prose and without a numeric rating: "Ingredient offenders include isopropyl myristate and its analogs, such as isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl isostearate, butyl stearate, isostearyl neopentanoate, myristyl myristate..." The rabbit-ear assay rates raw ingredients and does not predict how a finished formula behaves on human skin.