Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/MAC/Matte Lipstick, Smoked Purple 614
Matte Lipstick, Smoked Purple 614
MAC

Matte Lipstick, Smoked Purple 614

uncategorized

Your composite

39OUT OF 100Horrible

range 31–63

24▲▼ split
Safety
64
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

95-point split

0

Scan

95

Precautionary

0

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Alternatives

No fair cohort on file, so no comparison.

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 95-point gap between the two loudest voices.

0Greenlens Ingredient ScanIndependent
vs
95Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

95 pts apart
  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: US NTP Report on Carcinogens · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

7 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·31 of 33 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 31 of 33 listed ingredients; 2 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (13)

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • RED 21 LAKE8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 30 LAKE8/10raters disagree

    EU-prohibited · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • VANILLIN4/10fragranceraters disagree

    EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ACRYLATES COPOLYMER4/10film forming · antistatic · bindingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE4/10film formingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • BLUE 1 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 6 LAKE4/10colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 28 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 33 LAKE4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • YELLOW 5 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (18)

  • OCTYLDODECANOL
  • RICINUS COMMUNIS SEED OIL
  • SILICA
  • TRICAPRYLYL CITRATE
  • OZOKERITE
  • ISONONYL ISONONANOATE
  • PARAFFIN
  • PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
  • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
  • CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE
  • ASCORBYL PALMITATE
  • TOCOPHEROL
  • STEARYL STEAROYL STEARATE
  • MICA
  • IRON OXIDES
  • CARMINE
  • YELLOW 6 LAKE
  • YELLOW 10 LAKE

No data in our sources (2)

  • MICROCRYSTALLINE WAXCERA MICROCRISTALLINA CIRE MICROCRISTALLINE
  • COPERNICIA CERIFERA WAXCERA CARNAUBACIRE DE CARNAUBA

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.