Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/Revlon/Super Lustrous Glass Shine Lipstick, 014 Glaring Coral (2020 formulation)
Revlon

Super Lustrous Glass Shine Lipstick, 014 Glaring Coral (2020 formulation)

uncategorizedtypically $12–30

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+78 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 11420 cleaner options →9 in this price band or under

Ranked by safety only. We may earn a commission on the link; it never changes the order.

Your composite

43OUT OF 100Poor

range 37–61

22▲▼ split
Safety
78
Eco
30
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

40-point split

36

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission. It never changes a rating.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

11420 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 72-point gap between the two loudest voices.

4IARC MonographsGovernment
vs
76Greenlens Tolerance ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 11420 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

72 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · California Proposition 65 · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Labor

  • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →

Coverage & match quality

8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes

  • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
  • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

Weighted by what you care about

Tune your weights

composite recomputes live

+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating

No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

Ingredients, decoded

Data availability

Robust·31 of 35 characterized

Our sources have reference data on 31 of 35 listed ingredients; 4 are uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

Worth a look (10)

  • QUARTZ9/10abrasiveraters disagree

    NTP known carcinogen · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • TITANIUM DIOXIDE8/10uv filter · uv absorber · colorantraters disagree

    ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

  • BHT7/10fragrance · antioxidantraters disagree

    Endocrine-active · flagged by 3 of 9 lists

  • PARFUM6/10perfuming · fragranceraters disagree

    Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • POLYETHYLENE4/10film forming · abrasive · viscosity controllingraters disagree

    EU microplastics-restricted · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • ALOE BARBADENSIS LEAF EXTRACT4/10humectant · emollient · oral careraters disagree

    IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B) · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • PHENOXYETHANOL4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

    Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

  • RED 33 LAKE4/10raters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 64/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

  • RED 7 LAKE4/10cosmetic colorantraters disagree

    EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

✓No flags in our sources (21)

  • POLYBUTENE
  • DIISOSTEARYL MALATE
  • HYDROGENATED POLYISOBUTENE
  • DIPHENYLSILOXY PHENYL TRIMETHICONE
  • BIS-DIGLYCERYL POLYACYLADIPATE-2
  • OCTYLDODECYL NEOPENTANOATE
  • HYDROGENATED POLYDECENE
  • DIISOPROPYL DIMER DILINOLEATE
  • C10-30 CHOLESTEROL/LANOSTEROL ESTERS
  • OZOKERITE
  • MICA
  • SYNTHETIC WAX
  • SILICA SILYLATE
  • SODIUM HYALURONATE
  • BARIUM SULFATE
  • BUTYLENE GLYCOL
  • CAPRYLYL GLYCOL
  • ETHYLHEXYL PALMITATE
  • HEXYLENE GLYCOL
  • PENTAERYTHRITYL TETRAETHYLHEXANOATE
  • IRON OXIDES

No data in our sources (4)

  • SILICA DIMETHYL
  • SILYLATE
  • MAY CONTAIN / PEUT CONTENIR
  • YELLOW 5 LAKE YELLOW 6 LAKE

Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

Where this came from

Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗

Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.