Greenlens

Every public rating on one cosmetic, the places they disagree kept visible, and a single score whose weighting you control.

Navigate

  • Browse
  • In your home
  • Ask Sonion
  • Methodology
  • Criteria
  • Extension
  • How scoring works
  • Account

The one rule

We never blend a score that hides who disagrees. Funding model travels with every rating. Weights are computed at read time and never stored.

Cosmetics only · lead with safetyProduct data from public sources incl. Open Beauty Facts & EWG Skin Deep · their ratings never scraped or shown
As an Amazon Associate, Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Affiliate income never changes a rating or ranking.PrivacyTerms
Catalog/MERIT/Signature Lip Lightweight Satin Lipstick, Millennial
Signature Lip Lightweight Satin Lipstick, Millennial
MERIT

Signature Lip Lightweight Satin Lipstick, Millennial

uncategorized

Cleaner pick · Safest lips we have rated

VMV Hypoallergenics

Velvet Matte Lipstick

+50 on ingredient safety

$14

Ingredient safetyRaters agree
Find on Amazon ↗See all 7327 cleaner options →

Ranked by safety only. Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

Your composite

69OUT OF 100Fair

range 65–85

50▲▼ split
Safety
—
Eco
88
Labor
—
Pkg

Why this score

34-point split

42

Scan

42

Precautionary

76

Tolerance

See why →
Find on Amazon↗

Greenlens earns from qualifying purchases. Payout never affects a rating, a ranking, or the cleaner pick.

In your home

Sort this into a room

Cleaner options

7327 found

See better →

Flags

No ingredient flags.

Raters split

Ingredient safety

A 40-point gap between the two loudest voices.

42Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
vs
82IARC MonographsGovernment
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredient→

All 7327 cleaner options, safest first → We show the best 12, including the strongest on each axis.

Every rater, every axis

Ingredient safety

40 pts apart
  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

  • Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI) · California Proposition 65 · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · Health Canada Ingredient Hotlist

Environmental

    ✓Also screened, nothing found: EU Microplastics Restriction

    Labor

    • Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. Checked this week. about this rater →

    Coverage & match quality

    6 ratings · 2 of 4 axes

    • Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
    • Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.

    Weighted by what you care about

    Tune your weights

    composite recomputes live

    +
    1.0×
    Environmentalno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    1.0×
    Packagingno rating

    No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.

    0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.

    Ingredients, decoded

    Data availability

    Robust·26 of 27 characterized

    Our sources have reference data on 26 of 27 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.

    Worth a look (8)

    • CI 778918/10colorantraters disagree

      ANSES CMR-listed · flagged by 5 of 9 lists

    • Aroma6/10undeclared fragrance blendflavouringraters disagree

      Undisclosed fragrance blend · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Linalyl Acetate6/10fragranceraters disagree

      ANSES endocrine candidate · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • Phenoxyethanol4/10preservative · antimicrobialraters disagree

      Mild sensitizer for some · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • Vanillin4/10fragranceraters disagree

      EU-regulated fragrance allergen · flagged by 1 of 9 lists

    • CI 420904/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 191404/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    • CI 158504/10colorant · hair dyeingraters disagree

      EU-restricted (with limits) · flagged by 2 of 9 lists

    ✓No flags in our sources (18)

    • Ricinus Communis Seed Oil
    • Isostearyl Isostearate
    • Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
    • Dimer Dilinoleyl Dimer Dilinoleate
    • Tribehenin
    • C10-18 Triglycerides
    • Synthetic Wax
    • Bis-Diglyceryl Polyacyladipate-2
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Wax
    • Copernicia Cerifera Wax
    • Carica Papaya Fruit Extract
    • Helianthus Annuus Seed Oil
    • Ascorbyl Palmitate
    • Tocopherol
    • Beta-Sitosterol
    • Squalene
    • Tropolone
    • CI 77742

    No data in our sources (1)

    • CI 77491/CI 77492/CI 77499

    Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.

    What these ingredient tags mean (1)

    These describe what an ingredient is, not whether it is a problem. The stance marks above are the ratings; these are not.

    • undeclared fragrance blendAroma

      • Aroma: A blend the label does not itemize, so what is in it cannot be read from the ingredient list. EU Regulation (EC) 1223/2009 permits the collective term "parfum"; the SCCS Opinion on Fragrance Allergens (SCCS/1459/11) reviews the contact-allergy evidence for the substances it can contain.