Walgreens
Walgreen Anti Wrinkle Formula Revitalizing Day/night Eye Cream
uncategorized
hover a pillar to set the scene →
Raters split
Ingredient safety
A 35-point gap between the two loudest voices.
65California Proposition 65Government
vs100Greenlens Precautionary ScreenIndependent
050100
See why, ingredient by ingredientEvery rater, every axis
Ingredient safety
35 pts apartIndependent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Independent — not funded by the brands it rates. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Also screened, nothing found: ANSES Endocrine Disruptors · US NTP Report on Carcinogens · ECHA SVHC Candidate List · EU Harmonised Classification (CLP Annex VI)
Environmental
A government authority. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Labor
Run by a nonprofit. Auto-linked to this product, not yet human-reviewed. about this rater →
Coverage & match quality
8 ratings · 3 of 4 axes
- Some ratings rest on an automatic match that has not been human-reviewed.
- Fewer raters reach smaller-brand products, so a missing rating is not a clean bill of health, only a gap.
Weighted by what you care about
Tune your weights
composite recomputes live
+
1.0×
1.0×
1.0×
Packagingno rating
No rater covers this axis for this product, so its weight can't move the score.
0 means ignored. Higher = more weight in your composite.
Ingredients, decoded
Data availability
Robust32 of 33 characterized
Our sources have reference data on 32 of 33 listed ingredients; 1 is uncharacterized in our data — a gap, not a clean bill.
Worth a look (4)
Prop 65-listedflagged by 4 of 9 lists
IARC possible carcinogen (Group 2B)flagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU microplastics-restrictedflagged by 1 of 9 lists
EU-restricted (with limits)flagged by 2 of 9 lists
No flags in our sources (28)
- WATER
- GLYCERIN
- BUTYROSPERMUM PARKII BUTTER
- DIMETHICONE
- DIPENTAERYTHRITYL HEXA C5-9 ACID ESTERS
- CETEARYL ALCOHOL
- POLYSORBATE 80
- STEARIC ACID
- PALMITIC ACID
- MYRISTIC ACID
- CAPSICUM ANNUUM FRUIT EXTRACT
- JUGLANS REGIA SEED EXTRACT
- VACCINIUM ANGUSTIFOLIUM FRUIT EXTRACT
- AGARICUS BISPORUS EXTRACT
- BETA-GLUCAN
- ACETYL HEXAPEPTIDE-8
- SILICA
- PPG-3 BENZYL ETHER MYRISTATE
- PEI-10
- POLYISOBUTENE
- POLYSORBATE 20
- SORBITAN ISOSTEARATE
- GLYCERYL STEARATE
- PEG-100 STEARATE
- GLYCERYL STEARATE SE
- DISODIUM EDTA
- HYDROXYACETOPHENONE
- 1,2-HEXANEDIOL
No data in our sources (1)
Not a verdict — our authorities simply have no reference for these.
Where this came from
Cruelty-free status recorded from crueltyfree.peta.org ↗
Researched facts on Greenlens always carry the page that stated them — nothing is inferred from a model's memory.